4.6 Article

Xylem sap flows of irrigated Tamarix elongata Ledeb and the influence of environmental factors in the desert region of Northwest China

期刊

HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES
卷 21, 期 10, 页码 1363-1369

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/hyp.6314

关键词

xylem sap flux; heat-pulse method; xylem water transport; desert plants; Tamarix elongata Ledeb

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Tamarix elongata Ledeb is a desert shrub found in the desert region of Northwest China and is commonly cultivated as a sand-holding plant in this region. To understand its water requirement and the effects of climate conditions on its growth, trunk xylem sap flows of irrigated 8-year-old Tamarix elongata Ledeb plants were monitored continuously with heat-pulse sap flow meters for the entire season. Soil moisture contents at 0-300 em layer depth were also measured with a tube type time domain reflectometry (Tube-TDR). Meteorological factors, i.e. solar radiation, air temperature, relative humidity and wind speed were simultaneously monitored by an automatic weather station at the site. Daily and seasonal variations of the trunk sap fluxes and their correlations with the meteorological factors, reference evapotranspiration and soil moisture contents in the root-zone were analysed. The results indicated that frost influenced the trunk sap flux greatly under irrigated conditions, although the flux generally fluctuated with the variation of environmental factors and showed a mean trunk sap flux of 4.18 1 d(-1). There was a significantly exponential relationship between sap flux and the reference value of crop evapotranspiration, with a correlation coefficient of R-2 = 0.7172. The sap flux also had a significant correlation with the soil water contents at a depth of 150-300 cm from soil surface (R-2 = 0.5014). The order of the main meteorological factors affecting the sap flux of Tamarix elongata Ledeb trees was solar radiation > air temperature > vapour pressure deficit > relative humidity > wind speed. Copyright 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据