4.6 Article

Fractal adsorption characteristics of complex molecules on particles - A case study of dyes onto granular activated carbon (GAC)

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2006.11.044

关键词

fractal adsorption characteristics; GAC; surface fractal dimension D-s; spectral dimension d(s); non-integer effective reaction order

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The isothermic and kinetic adsorption processes of three dyes onto granular activated carbon (GAC) were studied in this paper. Langmuir fractal equation was chosen to fit the adsorption isotherm data. The exponent m in the equation is a function of surface fractal dimension (D-s) of particles and cross-section area (alpha(0)) or radius (r(0)) of dye molecules, which can be approximately estimated according to the relation between the first order term of molecular connective index (1)chi and the total surface molecular area (TSA). Based on the modeling results, D-s of the GAC was estimated to be 2.59, indicating the fractal adsorption characteristics of GAC. To elucidate the adsorption kinetics of complex molecules onto fractal surfaces, the relationships of m, kinetic parameter h and fractal spectral dimension (d(s)) were developed, and the derivative relation of ds and surface fractal dimension D-s was achieved. Adsorption kinetic results showed that the kinetic process had fractal-like characteristics. The instantaneous rate coefficient exhibited power-law relation with reaction time. Although h was larger than one in this study, both the fractal spectral dimension (d(s)) and the order of reaction could be obtained, and the corresponding d(s) values were less than two. The effective reaction order x was related to d(s), D-s and adsorbate concentration, and it was found that the order of diffusion-controlled adsorption reaction was fractional in most cases. The h or d(s) values calculated here implied that the reciprocating shake was not always effective to eliminate the dimensional constraints. (c) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据