4.7 Article

Wnt-7a induces presynaptic colocalization of α7-nicotinic acetylcholine receptors and adenomatous polyposis coli in hippocampal neurons

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE
卷 27, 期 20, 页码 5313-5325

出版社

SOC NEUROSCIENCE
DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3934-06.2007

关键词

nAChR; APC; synapse; Wnt; Wnt target gene; neurons

资金

  1. NIDA NIH HHS [R01 DA015389, DA015389] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NINDS NIH HHS [NS040417, R01 NS040417] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs) contribute significantly to hippocampal function. alpha 7-nAChRs are present in presynaptic sites in hippocampal neurons and may influence transmitter release, but the factors that determine their presynaptic localization are unknown. We report here that Wnt-7 alpha, a ligand active in the canonical Wnt signaling pathway, induces dissociation of the adenomatous polyposis coli (APC) protein from the beta-catenin cytoplasmic complex and the interaction of APC with alpha 7-nAChRs in hippocampal neurons. Interestingly, Wnt-7 alpha induces the relocalization of APC to membranes, clustering of APC in neurites, and coclustering of APC with different, presynaptic protein markers. Wnt-7 alpha also increases the number and size of coclusters of alpha 7-nAChRs and APC in presynaptic terminals. These short-term changes in alpha 7-nAChRs occur in the few minutes after ligand exposure and involve translocation to the plasma membrane without affecting total receptor levels. Longer-term exposure to Wnt-7 alpha increases nAChR alpha 7 subunit levels in an APC-independent manner and increases clusters of alpha 7-nAChRs in neurites via an APC-dependent process. Together, these results demonstrate that stimulation through the canonical Wnt pathway regulates the presynaptic localization of APC and alpha 7-nAChRs with APC serving as an intermediary in the alpha 7-nAChR relocalization process. Modulation by Wnt signaling may be essential for alpha 7-nAChR expression and function in synapses.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据