4.8 Article

Resistance of melanoma cells to TRAIL does not result from upregulation of antiapoptotic proteins by NF-κB but is related to downregulation of initiator caspases and DR4

期刊

ONCOGENE
卷 26, 期 23, 页码 3364-3377

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/sj.onc.1210134

关键词

melanoma; apoptosis; TRAIL; TRAIL-R1/DR4; initiator caspases

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) has attracted considerable attention as a novel anticancer agent. However, its efficiency may be diminished by occurring resistance in cancer cells. The mechanisms of TRAIL resistance in melanoma are still unsolved. Here we show for the first time that TRAIL-induced activation of NF-kappa B occurs in apoptosis-sensitive melanoma cell lines through TRAIL receptor 1/death receptor 4 (TRAIL-R1/DR4), whereas TRAIL failed to activate nuclear factor kappa B (NF-kappa B) in melanoma cells positive only for TRAIL receptor 2/death receptor 5 (TRAIL-R2/DR5). However, activation of NF-kappa B by TRAIL was not associated with enhanced expression of antiapoptotic factors: cellular FLICE-inhibitory protein (c-FLIP), Bcl-X-L, X-linked inhibitor of apoptosis protein (XIAP), Survivin, Livin. Rather in one of the cell lines, TRAIL induced the downregulation of DR4. In an established cell culture model for TRAIL resistance and regained TRAIL sensitivity, resistance was neither associated with increased NF-kappa B activity by TRAIL nor by an increased expression of antiapoptotic proteins. However, significant downregulation of caspase-8, caspase-10 and of DR4 was characteristic for TRAIL-resistant, DR4-positive melanoma cells, and regained TRAIL sensitivity coincided with re-expression of these factors. Sensitivity was also largely retained after their exogenous overexpression. Thus, initiator caspases and DR4 rather than NF-kappa B may control melanoma cell sensitivity to TRAIL, and strategies, which result in their upregulation, may be useful for enhancement of TRAIL sensitivity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据