4.7 Article

The virial balance of clumps and cores in molecular clouds

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
卷 661, 期 1, 页码 262-284

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1086/513708

关键词

ISM : clouds; ISM : globules; ISM : kinematics and dynamics; ISM : magnetic fields; MHD; turbulence

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We study the instantaneous virial balance of CCs in numerical models of MCs. The models represent a range of magnetic field strengths in MCs from subcritical to nonmagnetic regimes. We identify CCs at different density thresholds and calculate, for each object, the terms that enter the EVT. A CC is gravitationally bound when the gravitational term in the EVT is larger than the amount for the system to be virialized, which is more stringent than the condition that it be large enough to make the total volume energy negative. We also calculate other quantities used to indicate the state of gravitational boundedness: Jeans number J(c), mass-to-magnetic flux ratio mu(c), and virial parameter alpha(vir). Our results suggest the following: (1) CCs are dynamical out-of-equilibrium structures. (2) The surface energies are of the same order as their volume counterparts. ( 3) CCs are either in the process of being compressed or dispersed by the velocity field. Yet, not all CCs that have a compressive net kinetic energy are gravitationally bound. ( 4) There is no one-to-one correspondence between the states of gravitational boundedness as described by the virial analysis or by the other indicators. In general, in the virial analysis, only the inner regions of the objects are gravitationally bound, whereas J(c), alpha (vir), and mu(c) estimates tend to show that they are more bound at the lowest threshold levels and more magnetically supercritical. ( 5) We observe, in the nonmagnetic simulation, the existence of a bound core with structural and dynamical properties that resemble those of Barnard 68. This suggests that such cores can form in a larger MC and then be confined by the warm gas of a newly formed, nearby H II region.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据