4.8 Article

Evidence for regulatory function of nucleus-encoded factors on mRNA stabilization and translation in the chloroplast

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0703162104

关键词

Chlamydomonas reinhardtii; chloroplast gene expression; cytochrome f biogenesis; nuclear control; trans-acting factors

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A salient feature of organelle gene expression is the requirement for nucleus-encoded factors that act posttranscriptionally in a gene-specific manner. A central issue is to understand whether these factors are merely constitutive or have a regulatory function. In the unicellular alga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii, expression of the chloroplast petA gene-encoding cytochrome f, a major subunit of the cytochrome b(6)f complex, depends on two specific nucleus-encoded factors: MCA1, required for stable accumulation of the petA transcript, and TCA1, required for its translation. We cloned the TCA1 gene, encoding a pioneer protein, and transformed appropriate mutant strains with tagged versions of MCA1 and TCA1. In transformed strains expressing decreasing amounts of MCA1 or TCA1, the concentration of these factors proved limiting for petA mRNA accumulation and cytochrome f translation, respectively. This observation suggests that in exponentially growing cells, the abundance of MCA1 sets the pool of petA transcripts, some of which are TCA1-selected for an assembly-dependent translation of cytochrome f. We show that MCA1 is a short-lived protein. Its abundance varies rapidly with physiological conditions that deeply affect expression of the petA gene in vivo, for instance in aging cultures or upon changes in nitrogen availability. We observed similar but more limited changes in the abundance of TCA1. We conclude that in conditions where de novo, biogenesis of cytochrome b6f complexes is not required, a rapid drop in MCA1 exhausts the pool of petA transcripts, and the progressive loss of TCA1 further prevents translation of cytochrome f.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据