4.7 Article

Molecular characteristics of rifampicin- and isoniazid-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates from the Russian Federation

期刊

JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY
卷 59, 期 6, 页码 1057-1064

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkm086

关键词

drug resistance; tuberculosis; SNPs; MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives: Three Mycobacterium tuberculosis genetic loci-rpoB and katG genes and the fabG1(mabA)-inhA operon promoter region-were studied to reveal the mutations associated with rifampicin and isoniazid resistance. Methods: Four hundred and twelve isolates of M. tuberculosis from different regions of the Russian Federation were collected during 1997-2005. A matrix-assisted laser-desorption ionization -time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS)-based minisequencing method was used for the detection of mutations. Results: Thirteen different variants of single mutations in codons 533, 531, 526, 516, 513 and 511 of the rifampicin resistance-determining region of the rpoB gene as well as the TTG insertion in the 514a position were found among the rifampicin-resistant isolates. Single nucleotide substitutions in codons 531, 526 and 516 (64.8%, 10.3% and 7.7%, respectively) were the most prevalent mutations. Codon 526 was shown to be the most variable of all. No mutations were detected in rpoB genes for 29 (10.7%) of the rifampicin-resistant isolates. 76.9% of the isoniazid-resistant isolates carried single mutations in codon 315 of the katG gene. For another 12.9% of them, double mutations in the katG gene and the fabG1(mabA)-inhA promoter region were revealed. No mutations were detected in 8.2% of the isoniazid-resistant isolates. Conclusions: Molecular analysis of the loci of rpoB and katG genes and the inhA promoter region of 412 M. tuberculosis clinical isolates from various parts of the Russian Federation was carried out. The new MALDI-TOF MS-based method may be used for rapid and accurate monitoring of the spread of drug resistance.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据