4.5 Article

Magnetic resonance tracking of magnetically labeled autologous bone marrow CD34+ cells transplanted into the spinal cord via lumbar puncture technique in patients with chronic spinal cord injury:: CD34+ cells' migration into the injured site

期刊

STEM CELLS AND DEVELOPMENT
卷 16, 期 3, 页码 461-466

出版社

MARY ANN LIEBERT INC
DOI: 10.1089/scd.2007.0083

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The purpose of this study was to demonstrate the possibility of delivering autologous bone marrow precursor cells into the spinal cord via lumbar puncture technique (LP) in patients with spinal cord injury (SCI). Magnetic resonance imaging provides a noninvasive method for studying the fate of transplanted cells in vivo. Considering these propositions, we studied magnetic resonance tracking of autologous bone marrow CD34(+) cells labeled with magnetic nanoparticles delivered into the spinal cord via LP in patients with SCI. Sixteen patients with chronic SCI were enrolled and divided into two groups; one group got their own labeled-CD34(+) cells injected into the spinal cord via LP (n = 10); the others received an injection, but it contained magnetic beads without stem cells (controls, n = 6). CD34(+) cells were magnetically labeled with magnetic beads coated with a monoclonal antibody specific for the CD34 cell membrane antigen. Magnetic resonance images were obtained by a standard turbospin echo-T2 weighted sequences before and 20 and 35 days after post-transplantation. The median number of CD34(+) cells injected via LP was 0.7 X 10(6) (range 0.45 to 1.22 X 10(6)). Magnetically labeled CD34(+) cells were visible at the lesion site as hypointense signals in five patients of the labeled-CD34(+) group 20 and 35 days after transplantation; these signals were not visible in any patient of the control group. We suggested for the first time that autologous bone marrow CD34(+) cells labeled with magnetic nanoparticles delivered into the spinal cord via LP technique migrated into the injured site in patients with chronic SCI.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据