4.3 Review

Concerted actions of cholesteryl ester transfer protein and phospholipid transfer protein in type 2 diabetes: effects of apolipoproteins

期刊

CURRENT OPINION IN LIPIDOLOGY
卷 18, 期 3, 页码 251-257

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MOL.0b013e3280e12685

关键词

apolipoprotein A-I; apolipoprotein E; cholesteryl ester transfer protein; phospholipid transfer protein; type 2 diabetes

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose of review Type 2 diabetes frequently coincides with dyslipidemia, characterized by elevated plasma triglycerides, low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels and the presence of small dense low-density lipoprotein particles. Plasma lipid transfer proteins play an essential role in lipoprotein metabolism. It is thus vital to understand their pathophysiology and determine which factors influence their functioning in type 2 diabetes. Recent findings Cholesteryl ester transfer protein-mediated transfer is increased in diabetic patients and contributes to low plasma high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels, Apolipoproteins A-I, A-II and E are components of the donor lipoprotein I particles that participate in the transfer of cholesteryl esters from high-density lipoprotein to apolipoprotein B-containing lipoproteins. Current evidence for functional roles of apolipoproteins C-I, F and A-IV as modulators of cholesteryl ester transfer is discussed. Phospholipid transfer protein activity is increased in diabetic patients and may contribute to hepatic very low-density lipoprotein synthesis and secretion and vitamin E transfer. Apolipoprotein E could stimulate the phospholipid transfer protein-mediated transfer of surface fragments of triglyceride-rich lipoproteins to high-density lipoprotein, and promote high-density lipoprotein remodelling. Summary Both phospholipid and cholesteryl ester transfer proteins are important in very low and high-density lipoprotein metabolism and display concerted actions in patients with type 2 diabetes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据