4.5 Article

Correlation of folate, vitamin B12 and homocysteine plasma levels with depression in an elderly Greek population

期刊

CLINICAL BIOCHEMISTRY
卷 40, 期 9-10, 页码 604-608

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2007.01.007

关键词

folate; vitamin B-12; homocysteine; depression; elderly

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Alterations in folate, vitamin B-12 and homocysteine plasma levels have been associated with aging, neuronal development and depressive symptomatology. Nevertheless, the associations are not strong enough to suggest the use of these parameters in every day practice for diagnostic or therapeutic purposes. Objectives: The aim of the study was to investigate the relationship between plasma folate, vitamin B-12 and homocysteine in depressive states in the elderly. Methods: Community-dwelling, elderly individuals over 60 years of age were screened with the Geriatric Depression Scale. The study population was divided into two groups: (a) 33 subjects with depression and (b) 33 healthy controls. All participants were clinically evaluated and completed a questionnaire for socio-demographic and clinical data. Measurements of folate, vitamin B-12 and homocysteine were estimated in all blood samples and results were statistically evaluated at p < 0.05 level of significance. Results: No statistical significance emerged for the socio-demographic data between the two groups. Chronic diseases such as stroke, hypercholesterolemia, hypertension and diabetes also did not differ between the depression and control group. Group (a) had significantly lower levels of folate and vitamin B-12 than group (b). Homocysteine was significantly higher in depressed individuals than in controls. Conclusion: Lower levels of plasma folate and/or vitamin B-12, and higher levels of plasma homocysteine are associated with depression in elderly individuals. (c) 2007 The Canadian Society of Clinical Chemists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据