4.3 Article

Phylogeography of the capercaillie in Eurasia: what is the conservation status in the Pyrenees and Cantabrian Mounts?

期刊

CONSERVATION GENETICS
卷 8, 期 3, 页码 513-526

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10592-006-9165-2

关键词

evolutionary significant unit; glacial refugia; grouse; mitochondrial DNA control region; Tetrao urogallus

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Western capercaillie (Tetrao urogallus) is a keystone species of Palearctic boreal and altitude coniferous forests. With the increase of mountain leisure activities and habitat loss, populations are declining in most mountain ranges in Western Europe. Recent work has shown that the populations from the Pyrenees and Cantabrian Mountains survived a severe bottleneck during the 19th century, and are still considered as threatened due to habitat fragmentation and isolation with other populations. We present an extensive phylogeographic study based on mitochondrial DNA sequence (control region) extracted non-invasively from faeces collected throughout the species range (from western European mountains to central and eastern Europe, Fenno-Scandia, Russia and Siberia). We also compared our results with DNA sequences of closely related black-billed capercaillie (T. parvirostris). We found that populations from Pyrenees and Cantabrians are closely related but are different from all other capercaillie populations that form a homogenous clade. Therefore, we consider that these South-Western populations should be considered as forming an Evolutionary Significant Unit that needs an appropriate management at a local scale. We also discuss the possible locations of glacial refugia and subsequent colonisation routes in Eurasia, with a Western aquitanus lineage from Iberia and Balkans, and an Eastern urogallus lineage from Southern Asia. This work might have important implication for capercaillie conservation strategies to define important areas for conservation, and to prevent possible exchange or introductions of individuals originated from other lineages.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据