4.7 Article

Endothelial cell apoptosis in obstructive sleep apnea - A link to endothelial dysfunction

期刊

出版社

AMER THORACIC SOC
DOI: 10.1164/rccm.200611-1598OC

关键词

sleep apnea; endothelium; apoptosis; vasodilation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Rationale: Patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) are at increased risk for cardiovascular diseases. Injury of endothelial cells has been advanced as an initial trigger to atherosclerosis. Objectives: To study the association between circulating apoptotic endothelial cells and vasomotor dysfunction as a function of sleep apnea. Methods: Brachial artery flow-mediated dilation was determined in 14 subjects with documented COSA and 10 healthy control subjects at baseline and 8 weeks after continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy. Quantification of circulating apoptotic endothelial cells (CD146(+) Annexin V+) was performed by flow cytometry. Measurements and Main Results: Compared with healthy subjects, patients with OSA had higher numbers of circulating CD146+ Annexin VI cells (39.2 +/- 13.6 cells/mL and 17.8 +/- 9.4, respectively; p < 0.001). Increased apoptotic endothelial cells correlated moderately with abnormal vascular function (r = -0.61; p = 0.001). A significant correlation was observed between CD146 Annexin V+ cells and the apnea-hypopnea index (r = 0.56; p = 0.004). After 8 weeks of treatment with CPAP, the numbers of circulating apoptotic endothelial cells were reduced significantly from 39.2 +/- 13.6 to 22.3 +/- 12.9 apoptotic cells per milliliter (p < 0.001) and correlated with improvement in endothelium-dependent vasodilation (Or = 0.49; p = 0.07). Conclusions: In patients with OSA, impairment of endothelial-dependent vasodilation correlated with the degree of endothelial cell apoptosis. CPAP therapy led to significant decline in circulating apoptotic endothelial cells. These findings provide an additional mechanism for the predisposition of patients with COSA to premature vascular disease.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据