4.5 Article

Identification of developmentally regulated genes in Entamoeba histolytica:: insights into mechanisms of stage conversion in a protozoan parasite

期刊

CELLULAR MICROBIOLOGY
卷 9, 期 6, 页码 1426-1444

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2006.00882.x

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIAID NIH HHS [AI-037941, AI-043596, AI-044893, AI-068899, T32-AI07502, T32-AI07328] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIDDK NIH HHS [P30 DK56339] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Developmental switching between life-cycle stages is a common feature among many pathogenic organisms. The protozoan parasite Entamoeba histolytica converts between cysts (essential for disease transmission) and trophozoites (responsible for tissue invasion). Identification of genes involved in the developmental pathway has been severely hindered by the inability to generate E. histolytica cysts in vitro. Using parasite strains derived from recent human infections and whole-genome transcriptional profiling, we determined that 1439 genes (similar to 15% of annotated genes) were potentially developmentally regulated. Genes enriched in cysts (672 in total) included cysteine proteinases and transmembrane protein kinases, which may be involved in signal transduction. Genes enriched in trophozoites (767 in total) included genes typically thought of as important in tissue invasion by trophozoites, including the Gal/GalNAc lectin light subunit and cysteine protease 1. Putative regulators of differentiation including possible G-protein coupled receptors, signal transduction proteins and transcription factors were identified. A number of E. histolytica stage-specific genes were also developmentally regulated in the reptilian parasite E. invadens, indicating that they likely have conserved functions in Entamoeba development. These advances lay the groundwork for dissection of the molecular signals that initiate stage conversion and development of novel diagnostic and therapeutic measures targeting E. histolytica cysts.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据