4.6 Article

Hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence and death following living and deceased donor liver transplantation

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION
卷 7, 期 6, 页码 1601-1608

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2007.01802.x

关键词

A2ALL; DDLT; HCC; LDLT; MELD; recurrence

资金

  1. NIDDK NIH HHS [U01 DK062531, U01 DK062531-07, U01 DK062531-01, U01 DK062531-04, U01 DK062536, U01 DK062496, U01 DK062531-08, U01 DK062531-05S1, U01 DK062467, U01 DK062483, U01 DK062498, U01 DK062531-03, U01 DK062444, U01 DK062531-08S1, U01 DK062505, U01 DK062484, U01 DK062531-07S1, U01 DK062531-02, U01 DK062531-09, U01 DK062494, U01 DK062531-10, U01 DK062531-05, U01 DK062531-06S1, U01 DK062531-06, U01 DK062531-09S1] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We examined mortality and recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) among 106 transplant candidates with cirrhosis and HCC who had a potential living donor evaluated between January 1998 and February 2003 at the nine centers participating in the Adult-to-Adult Living Donor Liver Transplantation Cohort Study (A2ALL). Cox regression models were fitted to compare time from donor evaluation and time from transplant to death or HCC recurrence between 58 living donor liver transplant (LDLT) and 34 deceased donor liver transplant (DDLT) recipients. Mean age and calculated Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) scores at transplant were similar between LDLT and DDLT recipients (age: 55 vs. 52 years, p = 0.21; MELD: 13 vs. 15, p = 0.08). Relative to DDLT recipients, LDLT recipients had a shorter time from listing to transplant (mean 160 vs. 469 days, p < 0.0001) and a higher rate of HCC recurrence within 3 years than DDLT recipients (29% vs. 0%, p = 0.002), but there was no difference in mortality or the combined outcome of mortality or recurrence. LDLT recipients had lower relative mortality risk than patients who did not undergo LDLT after the center had more experience (p = 0.03). Enthusiasm for LDLT as HCC treatment is dampened by higher HCC recurrence compared to DDLT.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据