4.5 Article

Prevalence and risk factors for depression in a longitudinal, population-based study including individuals in the community and residential care

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GERIATRIC PSYCHIATRY
卷 15, 期 6, 页码 497-505

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1097/JGP.0b013e31802e21d8

关键词

depression; longitudinal study; prevalence; epidemiology; activities of daily living; institutionalization

资金

  1. NIA NIH HHS [AG08523-02] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: The authors report the population prevalence of depression in older adults living in the community and in residential care. Demographic, medical, health behavior, functional and cognitive measures, and transition to residential care are evaluated as risk factors for depression over eight years. Methods: Depression prevalence estimates were obtained from the initial electoral role sample of the Australian Longitudinal Study of Ageing that included persons living in residential care. A subsample (N = 1,116) based on follow-up data were included in longitudinal multilevel analyses that evaluated between-person and within-person predictors associated with scores from the Center for Epidemiology - Depression Scale. Results: At wave 1, 14.4% of community-dwelling and 32.0% of residential care-dwelling participants were depressed (15.2% of total cases). Increase in depression was associated with antidepressant status, sex, education, and marital status, but not history of hypertension, stroke, diabetes, heart disease, or smoking. Time-varying predictors, including residential care, activities of daily living, instrumental activities of daily living, self-rated health, and Mini-Mental State Examination, predicted depressive symptoms both between and within persons. Conclusions: Depression is strongly linked with factors indicating increased dependency. Risk assessment and targeting of intervention strategies to prevent depression in late life should incorporate changes in functional capacity, mental status, and need for residential care.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据