4.3 Article

A Novel Fluorescent Probe for Copper Ions Based on Polymer-modified CdSe/CdS Core/Shell Quantum Dots

期刊

ANALYTICAL SCIENCES
卷 27, 期 6, 页码 643-647

出版社

JAPAN SOC ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.2116/analsci.27.643

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [20775010, 21075011, 21003014]
  2. Hunan Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China [09JJ3016, 10JJ5002]
  3. Foundation of Science and Technology Agency of Hunan Province of China [2009WK4005, 2009FJ3173, 2010FJ3167]
  4. Foundation of Hunan Provincial Key Laboratory of Materials Protection for Electric Power and Transportation of China [2011CL05]
  5. Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China [NCET-10-0138]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Quantum dots (QDs) have become one of the most attractive fields of current research because of their unique optical properties. Novel copper-sensitive fluorescent fluoroionophores based on CdSe/CdS core/shell QDs modified with a polymer of MAO-mPEG were synthesized and characterized in the present work. A pH of 6.47 was optimally selected for measurements. By modifying QDs with MAO-mPEG, significant aqueous fluorescence quenching was observed upon binding with copper ions involving both reduced and oxidized environments, indicating great sensitivity and specificity for copper-ion sensing. No significant interfering effects from other metal ions, such as Ag+, Al3+, Ba2+, Ca2+, Cd2+, Co2+, Cr3+, Fe2+, Fe3+, Hg2+, K+, Mg2+, Mn2+, Na+, Ni2+, Pb2+, Sn2+, and Zn2+, were observed. The linear response range for Cu2+ was found to be 0.01 - 0.50 mu M, and the limit of detection was evaluated to be 16 nM. The proposed method demonstrated improved sensitivity and selectivity characteristics for Cu(II) determinations based on CdSe/CdS core/shell QDs modified with MAO-mPEG by using a typical liquid-phase quenching assay, showing its potential application to multiplex sensing of different analytes through distinct ligand conjugation and functionalization of individual fluorophores.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据