4.7 Article

Cross-linking of signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 - A molecular marker for the photodynamic reaction in cells and tumors

期刊

CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH
卷 13, 期 11, 页码 3156-3163

出版社

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-2950

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [R21CA119535, R01CA085580, P01CA55791, P30CA16056] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: Photodynamic therapy (PDT) depends on the delivery of a photosensitizer to the target tissue that, under light exposure, produces singlet oxygen and other reactive oxygen species, which in turn cause the death of the treated cell. This study establishes a quantitative marker for the phortoreaction that will predict the outcome of PDT Experimental Design: Cells in tissue culture, murine s.c. tumors, and endobronchial carcinomas in patients were treated with PDT, and the noncleavable cross-linking of the latent signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3) was determined. Results: Murine and human cancer cell lines reacted to PDT by an immediate covalent cross-linking of STAT3 to homodimeric and other complexes. The magnitude of this effect was strictly a function of the PDT reaction that is determined by the photosensitizer concentration and light dose. The cross-link reaction of STAT3 was proportional to the subsequent cytotoxic outcome of PDT An equivalent photoreaction as detected in vitro occurred in tumors treated in situ with PDT. The light dose-dependent STAT3 cross-linking indicated the relative effectiveness of PDT as a function of the distance of the tissue to the treating laser light source. Absence of cross-links correlated with treatment failure. Conclusions: The data suggest that the relative amount of cross-linked STAT3 predicts the probability for beneficial outcome, whereas absence of cross-links predicts treatment failure. Determination of STAT3 cross-links after PDT might be clinically useful for early assessment of PDT response.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据