4.7 Article

Fungal wound infection (not colonization) is independently associated with mortality in burn patients

期刊

ANNALS OF SURGERY
卷 245, 期 6, 页码 978-985

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/01.sla.0000256914.16754.80

关键词

-

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To analyze the occurrence of fungal wound infection (FWI) after thermal injury and its relationship to mortality. Background: FWI is an uncommon but potentially lethal complication of severe thermal injury. Methods: The records of patients with thermal burns admitted to a single burn center (1991-2002) were reviewed. Analyses accounted for total burn size (TBS, percentage body surface area), full-thickness burn size (FTBS, percentage body surface area), age, inhalation injury, sex, and fungal-status category. Fungal colonization and infection were determined histopathologically. Results: Criteria for inclusion were met by 2651 patients. Each patient's fungal-status category was defined according to the deepest level of fungal involvement observed during the hospital course: no fungus (2476 patients), fungal wound colonization (FWC, 121 patients), or fungal wound infection (FWI, 54 patients). Median TBS (9%, 47%, 64%, respectively) and mortality (5%, 27%, 76%, respectively) varied significantly among fungal-status groups. Logistic regression was used to detect significant independent associations. FWI was associated with higher TBS. Mortality was associated with TBS, FTBS, inhalation injury, FWI, and age. Unlike FWI, FWC was not independently related to mortality, the greater observed mortality in FWC being explained by other variables such as TBS. The odds ratio for FWI (8.16) suggested about the same mortality impact as augmenting TBS by 33%. A midrange TBS of 30% to 60% was required for most of the detectable association of FWI with mortality. Conclusions: FWI accompanies larger bums and is associated with mortality in burn patients, particularly in those with TBS 30% to 60%. This association is independent of burn size, inhalation injury, and age.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据