4.3 Article

Preoperative beta-blocker use reduces atrial fibrillation in off-pump coronary bypass surgery

期刊

ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY
卷 77, 期 6, 页码 429-432

出版社

BLACKWELL PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2007.04088.x

关键词

atrial fibrillation; beta-blocker; off-pump coronary artery surgery

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Backgrond: Atrial fibrillation (AF) after coronary artery bypass graft surgery constitutes the most common sustained arrhythmia and results in many complications. The purpose of this study was to assess the effects of prophylactic use of beta-blockers against atrial fibrillation in off-pump surgery patients in the early postoperative period. Methods: From 2002 to 2005, 78 patients were enrolled and 41 patients received 50 mg metoprolol succinate daily, which was initiated minimum four days before surgery. Preoperative beta-blocking therapy was continued until the morning of surgery. Thirty-seven patients were free of beta-blocker therapy. Esmolol was used within same range of doses in both groups during operations. Both groups recieved metoprolol succinate following operations. The frequency of AF occurrence was analysed from the operation time to the sixth postoperative day. Results: Sixteen patients developed AF with an overall incidence of 22.5%. Four patients from the study group and three patients from the control group were excluded from the study because of transfer to on-pump surgery. There was no difference with regard to the number of grafts carried out, duration of operations and ventilation, intensive care unit stay and inotropic need among groups. Length of hospital stay did not differ among groups either. There was a higher incidence of postoperative AF in patients without beta-blocker prophylaxis (11.7-32.4% P = 0.049). Conclusion: Low-dose postoperative beta-adrenergic blockade is valuable for patients who receive these medications before off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting procedures and may be beneficial against AF in all patients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据