4.6 Article

An unfolding latent variable model for likert attitude data: Drawing inferences adjusted for response style

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION
卷 102, 期 478, 页码 454-463

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1198/016214506000000960

关键词

attitude measurement; hierarchical model; item response theory; latent trait; latent variable; scale usage heterogeneity

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Likert attitude data consist of responses to favorable and unfavorable statements about an entity. where responses fall into ordered categories ranging from disagreement to agreement. Social science and rnarketing researchers frequently use data of this type to measure attitudes toward an entity such as a policy or product. We focus oil data on American and British attitudes toward their respective nations (national pride). We introduce a multidimensional Unfolding model (MUM) to describe the relationship between the data and the attitudes underlying I Just attitudes. but also response style, which is defined as a them. Unlike most existing, models, the MUM allows the data to reflect not consistent and content-independent pattern of response category selection such as a tendency to agree with all statements. The MUM can be used to model multiple attitudes, which allows researchers to expand their analysis of the data of interest to include all available Likert data so as to increase information on response style. For example. we include additional data on immigration attitudes to help distinguish the effects of response style and national pride on our data. The MUM can be used to fit linear models for the effects of background variables oil attitudes. Resulting inferences about attitudes are adjusted for response style arid should be less biased. Simulation results strongly suggest that, unlike Likert's popular scoring model. the MUM yields unbiased inferences even when there are Unequal proportions of favorable and unfavorable statements.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据