4.6 Article

Determination of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in water samples by temperature-controlled ionic liquid dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction combined with high performance liquid chromatography

期刊

ANALYTICAL METHODS
卷 6, 期 8, 页码 2553-2559

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c3ay42254b

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21377167]
  2. Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University [NCET-10-0813]
  3. Science Foundation of China University of Petroleum, Beijing [KYJJ2012-01-15]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The present study describes a simple and sensitive method for the determination of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in water samples by temperature-controlled ionic liquid dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction prior to high performance liquid chromatography with an ultraviolet detector. Three ionic liquids including 1-hexyl-3-methylimidazolium hexafluorophosphate [C6MIM][PF6], 1-benzyl-3-methylimidazolium hexafluorophosphate [C7MIM][PF6] and 1-octyl-3-methylimidazolium hexafluorophosphate [C8MIM][PF6] were investigated for enrichment, and the experimental results indicated that the best extraction efficiencies were achieved when [C8MIM][PF6] was used as the extraction solvent. Other factors affecting the extraction efficiency such as the volume of ionic liquid, heating temperature, extraction time, addition of 2-propanol, centrifugation time and ionic strength were also optimized. Under the optimal conditions, the detection limits of PAHs were in the range of 0.0005-0.88 mg L-1. The intra-day and inter-day precisions of the proposed method (RSDs, n = 6) were in the range of 2.7-7.4% and 5.5-11.4%, respectively. The proposed method was applied to the analysis of real environmental water samples and good spiked recoveries in the range of 83.5-118% were achieved. All these results indicate that the proposed method is a viable alternative to existing methods and would be very useful in the future.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据