4.7 Article

Effects of once-weekly dosing of a long-acting release formulation of exenatide on glucose control and body weight in subjects with type 2 diabetes

期刊

DIABETES CARE
卷 30, 期 6, 页码 1487-1493

出版社

AMER DIABETES ASSOC
DOI: 10.2337/dc06-2375

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

OBJECTIVE - In patients with type 2 diabetes, exenatide reduces AlC, postprandial and fasting glucose, and weight. In this study we investigated the effects of continuous exenatide administration from a long-acting release (LAR) formulation. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS - in this randomized, placebo-controlled phase 2 study, exenatide LAR (0.8 or 2.0 mg) was administered subcutaneously once weekly for 15 weeks to subjects with type 2 diabetes (n = 45) suboptimally controlled with metformin (60%) and/or diet and exercise (40%): 40% female, AIC (mean +/- SD) 8.5 +/- 1.2%, fasting plasma glucose 9.9 +/- 2.3 mmol/l, weight 106 20 kg, and diabetes duration 5 - 4 years. RESULTS - From baseline to week 15, exenatide LAR reduced mean +/- SE AlC by - 1.4 +/- 0.3% (0.8 mg) and - 1.7 +/- 0.3% (2.0 mg), compared with +0.4 +/- 0.3% with placebo LAR (P < 0.0001 for both). AIC of <= 7% was achieved by 36 and 86% of subjects receiving 0.8 and 2.0 mg exenatide LAR, respectively, compared with 0% of subjects receiving placebo LAR. Fasting plasma glucose was reduced by - 2.4 +/- 0.9 mmol/l (0.8 mg) and - 2.2 +/- 0.5 mmol/l (2.0 mg) compared with + 1.0 +/- 0. 7 mmol/l with placebo LAR (P < 0.001 for both). Exenatide LAR reduced self-monitored postprandial hyperglycemia. Subjects receiving 2.0 mg exenatide LAR had body weight reductions (-3.8 +/- 1.4 kg) (P < 0.05), whereas body weight was unchanged with both placebo LAR and the 0.8-mg dose. Mild nausea was the most frequent adverse event. No subjects treated with exenatide LAR withdrew from the study. CONCLUSIONS - Exenatide LAR offers the potential of 24-h glycemic control and weight reduction with a novel once-weekly treatment for type 2 diabetes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据