4.6 Article

Measurement of DCF fluorescence as a measure of reactive oxygen species in murine islets of Langerhans

期刊

ANALYTICAL METHODS
卷 6, 期 9, 页码 3019-3024

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c4ay00288a

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [R01 DK080714]
  2. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DIABETES AND DIGESTIVE AND KIDNEY DISEASES [R01DK080714] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In islets of Langerhans, oxidative stress induced by reactive oxygen species (ROS) is thought to be critically involved in beta-cell dysfunction during the development of diabetes. However, ROS have also been hypothesized to play a role in cellular signalling. To aid in delineating the effects of ROS in living islets of Langerhans, the endocrine portion of the pancreas that contain beta-cells, we sought to develop a robust and reproducible protocol to measure these species using the fluorescent dye, 2',7'-dichlorodihydrofluorescein diacetate (H2DCF-DA). The protocol that was developed minimized photobleaching and leakage of H2DCF from murine islets and utilized a normalization procedure to further reduce experimental variability. The method allowed for similar to 25 min of DCF measurement in living islets. We used the developed protocol to compare DCF fluorescence from batches of islets incubated in varying glucose concentrations and observed similar to 1.5-fold higher fluorescence signals in 3 vs. 20 mM glucose. The effects of diazoxide, which clamps open (K+)ATP channels reducing intracellular [Ca2+] ([Ca2+](i)) without affecting glucose metabolism, were also investigated. The presence of diazoxide increased DCF fluorescence at all glucose concentrations tested while addition of 30 mM K+ to increase [Ca2+](i) reduced the fluorescence by similar to 15%. With the developed protocol, all experimental methods tested to increase [Ca2+](i) resulted in a decrease in DCF fluorescence, potentially indicating involvement of ROS in intracellular signalling cascades.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据