4.5 Article

Non-invasive predictors of survival in cardiac amyloidosis

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEART FAILURE
卷 9, 期 6-7, 页码 617-624

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejheart.2007.01.012

关键词

cardiac amyloidosis; echocardiography; electrocardiography; endomyocardial biopsy; risk assessment; survival

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Patients with cardiac amyloidosis (CA) have increased mortality. Aims: Clinical, electrocardiographic, and echocardiographic parameters were assessed for risk-stratification of CA. Methods and results: CA was confirmed by endomyocardial biopsy in 59 patients (54.8 +/- 1.2 years) with light-chain (n = 43) or transthyretin amyloidosis (n = 16). Six patients without CA served as controls (NCA). Clinical symptoms, electrocardiographic, and echocardiographic parameters were analyzed for prognostic significance. Of the patients with light-chain amyloidosis, 14 died and 2 underwent heart transplantation. 1-/3-year survival was 68%/63%. Survival depended on left ventricular function (LV-EF), LV mass, radius/wall thickness, septum thickness, low voltage pattern (LVP), conduction delay, NYHA class, and stem cell transplantation. A multivariate model only contained LV-EF and LVP; the beneficial effect of stem cell transplantation was cancelled out as this treatment was withheld in patients with highest cardiac risk. Survival was most limited if both risk factors occurred. Cardiac involvement in transthyretin amyloidosis showed better survival (2 deaths, 1-/3-year survival 91%/83%). Analysis of prognostic risk factor utility in all amyloid patients (light-chain and transthyretin) again revealed LVP and LU-EF, and aetiology of amyloidosis as independent survival parameters. Conclusion: Prognosis of CA is poor, but aetiology of amyloid, LVP, and LV-EF allows identification of patients at highest risk of death, who may require individual treatment approaches (heart transplantation prior to causative therapy). (C) 2007 European Society of Cardiology. Published by Elsevier B.V All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据