4.4 Article

Model of arterial tree and peripheral control for the study of physiological and assisted circulation

期刊

MEDICAL ENGINEERING & PHYSICS
卷 29, 期 5, 页码 542-555

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2006.08.004

关键词

lumped parameter model; myogenic control; metabolic control; capillary filtration; vasomotion; hemodilution; cardiopulmonary bypass

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Peripheral vasomotion, interstitial liquid exchange, and cardiovascular system behaviour are investigated by means of a lumped parameter model of the systemic and peripheral circulation, from the aortic valve to the venules. This modelling work aims at combining arterial tree hemodynamics description, active peripheral flow regulation, and fluid exchange. The arterial compartment is constructed with 63 RCL segments and 30 peripheral districts including myogenic control on arterioles, metabolic control on venules, and Starling filtration through capillary membrane. The arterial behaviour is characterised as to the long term stability of pressure/flow waves in the different segments. Peripheral districts show autoregulatory capabilities against pressure changes over a wide range and also self-sustained oscillations mimicking vasomotor activity. A preliminary study was carried out as to the model response to changes induced by cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). Among the induced alterations, the system responds mainly to hemodilution, which increased peripheral fluid loss and oedema beyond the compensatory capabilities of local regulation mechanisms. This resulted in an overall increase total arterial resistance. Local transport deficits were assessed for each district according to the different metabolic demand. This study shows the requirement of a suitable description of both arteries and peripheral mechanisms in order to describe cardiovascular response non-physiological conditions, as well as assisted circulation or other pathological conditions. (c) 2006 IPEM. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据