4.4 Article

Effects of periodontal therapy on serum C-reactive protein, sE-selectin, and tumor necrosis factor-α secretion by peripheral blood-derived macrophages in diabetes.: A pilot study

期刊

JOURNAL OF PERIODONTAL RESEARCH
卷 42, 期 3, 页码 274-282

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0765.2006.00945.x

关键词

C-reactive protein; diabetes; macrophages; periodontal disease

资金

  1. NIDCR NIH HHS [DE 14490] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Diabetes is associated with an increased risk for vascular disease and periodontitis. The aim of this study was to assess the effects of periodontal treatment in diabetes with respect to alterations in the pro-inflammatory potential of peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Ten patients with diabetes and moderate to severe periodontitis received full-mouth subgingival debridement. Blood samples for serum/plasma and mononuclear cell isolation were collected prior to and 4 wk after therapy. Mononuclear cells were analyzed by flow cytometry and stimulated with lipopolysaccharide or ionomycin/phorbol ester to determine the pro-inflammatory capacity of macrophages and lymphocytes, respectively. Following periodontal treatment, all patients demonstrated a significant improvement in clinical periodontal status (p < 0.05), despite only modest reduction in subgingival bacterial load or homologous serum immunoglobulin G titers. CD14(+) blood monocytes decreased by 47% (p < 0.05), and the percentage of macrophages spontaneously releasing tumor necrosis factor-alpha decreased by 78% (p < 0.05). There were no significant changes in the capacity of lymphocytes to secrete interferon-gamma. Among a number of serum inflammatory markers tested, high-sensitivity-C-reactive protein significantly decreased by 37% (p < 0.01) and soluble E-selectin decreased by 16.6% (p < 0.05). These data suggest a reduced tendency for monocyte/macrophage-driven inflammation with periodontal therapy and a potential impact on atherosclerosis-related complications in diabetic individuals.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据