4.6 Review

Cortical thinning of the attention and executive function networks in adults with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity disorder

期刊

CEREBRAL CORTEX
卷 17, 期 6, 页码 1364-1375

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhl047

关键词

ADHD; attention; cerebral cortex; cortical thickness; executive function

资金

  1. NCRR NIH HHS [P41 RR 14075] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NICHD NIH HHS [MH/HD 62152] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIMH NIH HHS [F32 MH 0605040-01A1, MH 16259, MH 57934] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) has been associated with structural alterations in brain networks influencing cognitive and motor behaviors. Volumetric studies in children identify abnormalities in cortical, striatal, callosal, and cerebellar regions. In a prior volumetric study, we found that ADHD adults had significantly smaller overall cortical gray matter, prefrontal, and anterior cingulate volumes than matched controls. Thickness and surface area are additional indicators of integrity of cytoarchitecture in the cortex. To expand upon our earlier results and further refine the regions of structural abnormality, we carried out a structural magnetic resonance imaging study of cortical thickness in the same sample of adults with ADHD (n = 24) and controls (n = 18), hypothesizing that the cortical networks underlying attention and executive function (EF) would be most affected. Compared with healthy adults, adults with ADHD showed selective thinning of cerebral cortex in the networks that subserve attention and EF. In the present study, we found significant cortical thinning in ADHD in a distinct cortical network supporting attention especially in the right hemisphere involving the inferior parietal lobule, the dorsolateral prefrontal, and the anterior cingulate cortices. This is the first documentation that AND in adults is associated with thinner cortex in the cortical networks that modulate attention and EF.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据