4.6 Article

Development of magnetic graphene as an adsorbent and matrix for selective enrichment and detection of crotonaldehyde in saliva by MALDI-TOF-MS

期刊

ANALYTICAL METHODS
卷 5, 期 18, 页码 4585-4590

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c3ay40931g

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Basic Research Priorities Program [2012CB910601, 2013CB911201]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21075022, 21275033, 21105016]
  3. Fudan University
  4. Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China [20110071110007, 20100071120053]
  5. Shanghai Municipal Natural Science Foundation [11ZR1403200]
  6. Shanghai Leading Academic Discipline Project [B109]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Crotonaldehyde has long been regarded as an important environmental pollutant from cigarette smoke to human health. To have an efficient and high-throughput screening of crotonaldehyde in saliva samples, it is essential to develop an analytical method considering both enrichment and measurement processes. In this study, we proposed a novel method based on matrix assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF-MS) for the analysis of crotonaldehyde in saliva. Magnetic graphene was synthesized via a facile hydrothermal process, and then applied as an adsorbent and a matrix for MALDI-TOF-MS. Crotonaldehyde in saliva was derived by 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazine first followed by a magnetic solid-phase extraction process and high-throughput MALDI-TOF-MS detection. Due to its large surface area, strong interaction force and excellent inherent properties, magnetic graphene showed a satisfactory ionization and enrichment performance for the enrichment and ionization of crotonaldehyde by MALDI-TOF-MS. The crotonaldehyde derivatives could be sensitively detected from saliva samples even at a low concentrations. The results indicated that the proposed method was simple, rapid, sensitive and efficient for the analysis of crotonaldehyde in saliva and other biological samples.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据