4.7 Article

Common origin and fixation of Plasmodium falciparum dhfr and dhps mutations associated with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine resistance in a low-transmission area in South America

期刊

ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY
卷 51, 期 6, 页码 2085-2091

出版社

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/AAC.01228-06

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIGMS NIH HHS [R01 GM60740, R01 GM084320, R01 GM060740] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recent studies indicated that sensitive parasites could increase in frequency in a population when drugs are removed, suggesting that the life span of affordable antimalarial drugs could be expanded. We studied 97 samples from Bolivar State, Venezuela, an area where sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP) has not been used for 8 years due to its ineffectiveness. We characterized point mutations in two genes that have been implicated in resistance to SP, dihydrofolate reductase (dhfr) and dihydropteroate synthase (dhps). We also assayed neutral microsatellite markers around the dhfr (chromosome 4) and dhps (chromosome 8) genes and on chromosomes 2 and 3 to track the origin and spread of resistant alleles. We found that drug-resistant SP mutants are fixed in the population. Two genotypes were present in the samples, dhfr(50R/511/108N) dhps(437G/540E/581G) (90.7%) and dhft(511/108N) dhps(437G/581G) (9.3%). We show a single microsatellite haplotype for all of the dhfr and dhps alleles, and the alleles at the microsatellite loci are different from those present in Africa. Thus, in these samples from Venezuela, there is a single origin for both dhfr and dhps SP-resistant alleles, and these alleles originated independently of those characterized from Africa. Furthermore, this is the first report of a hitchhiking effect on the genetic variation around dhps due to selection by SP using an extensive set of microsatellite markers. Our results indicate that, in areas where there is limited gene flow, the fixation of drug-resistant parasites in the population is stable, even after drug selection is relaxed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据