4.6 Article

A novel impedimetric immunosensor for the detection of chicken interferon-gamma based on a polythionine and gold nanoparticle modified glassy carbon electrode

期刊

ANALYTICAL METHODS
卷 5, 期 20, 页码 5684-5693

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c3ay40820e

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21075108, 21275162, 30972171]
  2. Qing Lan Project

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Currently, there is no effective detection method for chicken interferon-gamma (ChIFN-gamma), therefore it is of great significance to develop a new, accurate and sensitive method for the rapid detection of ChIFN-gamma to solve the problems which are directly impeding the in-depth research of immune regulatory factors and poultry immune responses, and which are preventing the analysis and evaluation of the immunity of poultry in diseases or after vaccination. This paper is the first report of a novel label-free electrochemical impedimetric immunosensor for the sensitive detection of ChIFN-gamma, based on a 3E(3) monoclonal antibody against chicken interferon-gamma (denoted as 3E(3)McAb) immobilized on a glassy carbon electrode modified with polythionine and gold nanoparticle self-assembled layers. The surface modification steps were characterized by scanning electron microscopy and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS). Detection was performed by measuring the relative change in impedance before and after the 3E(3)McAb-ChIFN-gamma reaction by EIS. Under the optimized conditions, the relative change in impedance was proportional to the logarithmic value of ChIFN-gamma concentrations in the range of 0.10 to 1.0 x 10(3) ng mL(-1) (r = 0.9946) with a detection limit of 0.10 ng mL(-1). Compared to the traditional method of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, the proposed method performed a low-cost, sensitive, quantitative detection of ChIFN-gamma in real samples with satisfactory results, indicating that the developed immunoassay could be a promising alternative approach for the detection of ChIFN-gamma.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据