4.6 Article

The blue plume population in dwarf spheroidal galaxies - Genuine blue stragglers or young stellar population?

期刊

ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
卷 468, 期 3, 页码 973-978

出版社

EDP SCIENCES S A
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20067024

关键词

stars : galaxies : dwarf; blue stragglers; galaxies : stellar content; stars : Hertzspring-Russell (HR) and C-M diagrams galaxies : Local Group; galaxies : photometry

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aims. Blue stragglers (BSS) in the Milky Way field and globular/open clusters are thought to be the product of either primordial or collisional binary systems. In the context of dwarf spheroidal galaxies it is hard to firmly disentangle a genuine BSS population from young main sequence (MS) stars tracing a similar to 1-2 Gyr old star forming episode. Methods. Assuming that their blue plume populations are made of BSS, we estimate the BSS frequency (F-HB(BSS); as normalized to the horizontal branch star counts) for 8 Local Group non star-forming dwarf galaxies, using a compilation of ground and space based photometry. Results. (i) The BSS frequency in dwarf galaxies, at any given M-V, is always higher than that in globular clusters of similar luminosities; (ii) the BSS frequency for the lowest luminosity dwarf galaxies is in excellent agreement with that observed in the Milky Way halo and open clusters; and most interestingly (iii) derive a statistically significant F-HB(BSS) - M-V anti-correlation for dwarf galaxies, similar to that observed in globular clusters. Conclusions. The low density, almost collision-less, environments of our dwarf galaxy sample allow us to infer (i) their very low dynamical evolution; (ii) a negligible production of collisional BSS; and consequently (iii) that their blue plumes are mainly made of primordial binaries. The dwarf galaxies F-BH(BSS) - M-V anti-correlation can be used as a discriminator: galaxies obeying the anti-correlation are more likely to possess genuine primordial BSS rather than young main sequence stars.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据