4.6 Article

A highly selective and sensitive fluorescence ratiometric probe for cyanide and its application for the detection of cyanide in natural water and biological samples

期刊

ANALYTICAL METHODS
卷 5, 期 23, 页码 6605-6610

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c3ay41475b

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21202063, 50925207, 51172100, 21103073]
  2. Ministry of Science and Technology of China for the International Science Linkages Program [2009DFA50620, 2011DFG52970]
  3. Ministry of Education of China for Changjiang Innovation Research Team [IRT1064]
  4. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province [BK2012281]
  5. Jiangsu Innovation Research Team, China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2012M511200]
  6. Research Foundation of Jiangsu University [11JDG078]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A fluorescent ratiometric probe, compound 1, for cyanide has been rationally constructed based on an intramolecular charge transfer (ICT) mechanism. Upon treatment with cyanide, probe 1 exhibited a fluorescence ratiometric response, with the emission wavelength displaying a very large shift (up to 160 nm). When 2 equivalents of cyanide were added, the emission ratios (I-458/I-618) of probe 1 changed dramatically from 0.027 to 28.306. In addition, the emission ratios (I-458/I-618) showed good linearity with the cyanide concentration in the range of 0-6.0 mu M, and the detection limit measured to be 0.126 mu M. The NMR experiments and theoretical calculations confirmed that the ratiometric response of probe 1 to cyanide is due to the nucleophilic addition reaction of the cyanide with the vinyl malononitrile group of probe 1, which results in the inhibition of the ICT process in the probe. Importantly, probe 1 has been applied to detection of cyanide in a natural water sample with satisfactory recovery. Furthermore, the quantitative determination of endogenous cyanide in cassava root demonstrated that the probe can be employed to detect endogenous cyanide in real biological samples.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据