4.3 Article

Self-reported mental health-related quality of life and mortality in men and women in the European prospective investigation into cancer (EPIC-Norfolk): A prospective population study

期刊

PSYCHOSOMATIC MEDICINE
卷 69, 期 5, 页码 410-414

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/psy.0b013e318068fcd4

关键词

self-reported mental functional health; HLEQ; UKSF-36; all-cause mortality

资金

  1. Medical Research Council [MC_U106179471, G0300128, G0401527] Funding Source: researchfish
  2. Medical Research Council [G0401527, G0300128, MC_U106179471] Funding Source: Medline
  3. MRC [G0300128] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To explore the relationship between self-reported mental functional health and mortality. Methods: Participants included 17,777 men and women aged 40 to 79 years at baseline who lived in Norfolk, UK, and had no known cardiovascular disease or cancer, and completed the anglicized Short Form 36-item questionnaire (UK SF-36) during 1996 to 2000 in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer-Norfolk prospective population study. We examined the relationship between mental functional health derived from the mental component summary scores of the SF-36 and mortality from all causes, cardiovascular disease, cancer, and other causes during an average 6.5-year follow-up. Results: There were 1065 deaths during a total of 115,550 person-years of follow-up. Impaired mental health-related quality of life was associated with increased risk of all-cause mortality in men and women. A decrease of 1 SD (10 points) in SF-36 mental component summary scores was associated with a 14% increase in all-cause mortality (hazards ratio = 1.14; 95% Confidence Interval: 1.07, 1.21) after controlling for age, gender, body mass index, systolic blood pressure, cholesterol, alcohol consumption, diabetes, smoking, social class, and physical functional health. Conclusion: Poor self-reported mental functional health is related to increased risk of all-cause mortality in men and women. Interpretation of this association requires further investigation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据