4.7 Article

Automated classification of lung bronchovascular anatomy in CT using AdaBoost

期刊

MEDICAL IMAGE ANALYSIS
卷 11, 期 3, 页码 315-324

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.media.2007.03.004

关键词

AdaBoost; bronchovascular segmentation; computed tomography; computer-aided diagnosis

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [R01 CA088973-04, R01-CA88973, R01 CA088973] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIBIB NIH HHS [T32 EB002101-30, T32 EB002101, 5 T32 EB002101] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Lung CAD systems require the ability to classify a variety of pulmonary structures as part of the diagnostic process. The purpose of this work was to develop a methodology for fully automated voxel-by-voxel classification of airways, fissures, nodules, and vessels from chest CT images using a single feature set and classification method. Twenty-nine thin section CT scans were obtained from the Lung Image Database Consortium (LIDC). Multiple radiologists labeled voxels corresponding to the following structures: airways (trachea to 6th generation), major and minor lobar fissures, nodules, and vessels (hilum to peripheral), and normal lung parenchyma. The labeled data was used in conjunction with a supervised machine learning approach (AdaBoost) to train a set of ensemble classifiers. Each ensemble classifier was trained to detect voxels part of a specific structure (either airway, fissure, nodule, vessel, or parenchyma). The feature set consisted of voxel attenuation and a small number of features based on the eigenvalues of the Hessian matrix (used to differentiate structures by shape). When each ensemble classifier was composed of 20 weak classifiers, the AUC values for the airway, fissure, nodule, vessel, and parenchyma classifiers were 0.984 +/- 0.011, 0.949 +/- 0.009, 0.945 +/- 0.018, 0.953 +/- 0.016, and 0.931 +/- 0.015, respectively. The strong results suggest that this could be an effective input to higher-level anatomical based segmentation models with the potential to improve CAD performance. (c) 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据