4.7 Article

Risk of progression to active tuberculosis among foreign-born persons with latent tuberculosis

期刊

CHEST
卷 131, 期 6, 页码 1811-1816

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1378/chest.06-2601

关键词

foreign birth; HIV infection; latent tuberculosis infection; recent immigration; tuberculosis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Increased risk for tuberculosis (TB) disease has been identified in foreign-born persons in the United States, particularly during the first 5 years after their arrival in the United States. This could be explained by undetected TB disease at entry, increased prevalence of latent TB infection (LTBI), increased progression from LTBI to TB, or a combination of these factors. Methods: We performed a cluster analysis of TB cases in Boston and a case-control study of risk factors for TB with an unclustered isolate among Boston residents with LTBI to determine whether such persons have an increased risk for reactivation of disease. Results: Of 321 case patients with TB seen between 1996 and 2000, 133 isolates were clustered and 188 were not. In multivariate analysis, foreign birth was associated with an unclustered isolate (odds ratio [OR], 2.2; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.2 to 3.8; p < 0.01), while being a close contact of a TB case was negatively associated (OR, 0.22; 95% CI, 0.07 to 0.73; p = 0.02). When 188 TB patients with unclustered isolates were compared to 188 age-matched control subjects with LTBI, there was no association between the occurrence of TB and foreign birth (OR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.42 to 1.3); among foreign-born persons, there was no association between the occurrence of TB and being in the United States <= 5 years (OR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.56 to 1.44). Conclusions: We conclude that the increased risk for TB among foreign-born persons in the United States may be attributable to the increased prevalence of LTBI among foreign-born persons or the increased prevalence of active disease at arrival in the United States, but not to an increased rate of reactivation among persons with LTBI.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据