4.6 Article

Ion chromatographic determination of structurally varied ionic liquid cations and anions-a reliable analytical methodology applicable to technical and natural matrices

期刊

ANALYTICAL METHODS
卷 3, 期 4, 页码 919-926

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c1ay05029j

关键词

-

资金

  1. European Commission [216011-2]
  2. German Federal Foundation for the Environment (Deutsche Bundesstiftung Umwelt (DBU), Osnabruck/Germany)
  3. Polish Ministry of Research and Higher Education [DS 8200-4-0085-11, N N204 527139]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An ion chromatographic system with conductometric detection was used to analyse a broad structural variety of ionic liquid (IL) cations and anions. The selection of cationic entities covered the chemical space of IL cations as comprehensively as possible and contained the most common head groups substituted with different alkyl- and functionalized side chains. Also investigated was a set of commonly used IL anions showing a relatively wide polarity range, from comparatively hydrophilic species (e. g. dicyanimide and tetrafluoroethanesulfonic acid) to moderately hydrophobic entities (e.g. (CF3SO2)(2)N- or B(CN)(4)(-)) and to the strongly hydrophobic trifluorotris(pentafluoroethyl) phosphate anion (((C2F5)(3)PF3)(-)). The separation of these IL constituents from inorganic matrix- forming ions (Li+, Na+, K+, Mg2+, Ca2+ or F-, Cl-, Br-, SO42-, HPO42-) was achieved for all 30 tested IL structures, depending on the eluent used. Activated sludge samples from biodegradation experiments were chosen for a case study in order to illustrate the performance and the usefulness of the methods developed. The separation and quantification of traces of IL ions in the presence of large numbers of inorganic ions and high organic matrix loads were demonstrated. In general, the analytical system and its associated methods appear to be widely applicable to a broad range of IL structures as well as different technical and natural matrices.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据