4.4 Article

Mathematical model of network dynamics governing mouse sleep-wake Behavior

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY
卷 97, 期 6, 页码 3828-3840

出版社

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/jn.01184.2006

关键词

-

资金

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [P50 HL060292, HL-60292, P50 HL060292-090005] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIMH NIH HHS [R01 MH062589, MH-62589, R01 MH062589-05] Funding Source: Medline
  3. PHS HHS [DAO-15644] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recent work in experimental neurophysiology has identified distinct neuronal populations in the rodent brain stem and hypothalamus that selectively promote wake and sleep. Mutual inhibition between these cell groups has suggested the conceptual model of a sleep-wake switch that controls transitions between wake and sleep while minimizing time spent in intermediate states. By combining wake- and sleep-active populations with populations governing transitions between different stages of sleep, a sleep-wake network of neuronal populations may be defined. To better understand the dynamics inherent in this network, we created a model sleep-wake network composed of coupled relaxation oscillation equations. Mathematical analysis of the deterministic model provides insight into the dynamics underlying state transitions and predicts mechanisms for each transition type. With the addition of noise, the simulated sleep-wake behavior generated by the model reproduces many qualitative and quantitative features of mouse sleep wake behavior. In particular, the existence of simulated brief awakenings is a unique feature of the model. In addition to capturing the experimentally observed qualitative difference between brief and sustained wake bouts, the model suggests distinct network mechanisms for the two types of wakefulness. Because circadian and other factors alter the fine architecture of sleep-wake behavior, this model provides a novel framework to explore dynamical principles that may underlie normal and pathologic sleep-wake physiology.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据