4.7 Article

Dynamics of accretion flows irradiated by a quasar

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
卷 661, 期 2, 页码 693-702

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1086/515389

关键词

accretion, accretion disks; methods : numerical

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We present results from axisymmetric time-dependent hydrodynamical calculations of gas flows under the influence of the gravity of black holes in quasars. We assume that the flows are nonrotating and exposed to quasar radiation. We take into account X-ray heating and the radiation force due to electron scattering and spectral lines. To compute the radiation field, we consider an optically thick, geometrically thin, standard accretion disk as a source of UV photons and a spherical central object as a source of X-rays. The gas temperature and ionization state in the flow are calculated self-consistently from the photoionization and heating rate of the central object. We find that for a 10(8) M circle dot black hole with an accretion luminosity of 0.6 of the Eddington luminosity, the flow settles into a steady state and has two components: ( 1) an equatorial inflow and ( 2) a bipolar inflow/ outflow with the outflow leaving the system along the disk rotational axis. The inflow is a realization of a Bondi-like accretion flow. The second component is an example of a nonradial accretion flow becoming an outflow once it is pushed close to the rotational axis where thermal expansion and radiation pressure accelerate it outward. Our main result is that the existence of the above two flow components is robust to the outer boundary conditions and the geometry and spectral energy distribution of the radiation field. However, the flow properties are not robust. In particular, the outflow power and collimation is higher for the radiation dominated by the UV/disk emission than for the radiation dominated by the X-ray/central engine emission. Our most intriguing result is that a very narrow outflow driven by radiation pressure on lines can carry more energy and mass than a broad outflow driven by thermal expansion.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据