4.6 Article

The efficacy of techniques for the disinfection of artificial sub-surface dentinal caries lesions and their effect on dernineralization and rernineralization in vitro

期刊

JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY
卷 35, 期 6, 页码 490-495

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2007.01.006

关键词

autoclave dentine; demineralization; disinfection; gamma irradiation; remineralization; thymol

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives: The efficacy of three techniques for the disinfection of artificial sub-surface root caries lesions and their response to subsequent episodes of de- and remineralization was investigated quantitatively in vitro. Methods: Sub-surface dentinal lesions (n = 20), cut into four experimental blocks and deliberately contaminated with Streptococcus mutans, were subject to either steam autoclaving (121 degrees C, 5 min), gamma irradiation (4100 Gy), immersion in 0.1% (w/v) thymol-distilled water solution (24 h) or reserved as a control. Next, the lesions were incubated aerobically in sterile nutrient broth for 24 h at 37 degrees C and resultant cultures plated onto blood agar and neutralisation agar. Ten blocks from each experimental group were then immersed in an acidic buffer solution or exposed to artificial saliva for 5 days. Baseline changes in the mineral content and distribution of the lesions were assessed by transverse microradiography (TMR). Results: Micro-organisms were recovered from each control block and one block treated by gamma irradiation. Steam autoclaving and immersion in a thymol solution significantly decreased (p < 0.05) the amount of mineral lost from the body of lesions subject to a further acid challenge. Mineral ion uptake by lesions exposed to artificial saliva was significantly increased (p < 0.05) through disinfection by steam autoclaving. Conclusions: Gamma irradiation proved the most acceptable method for the disinfection of sub-surface root dentine lesions having the least adverse effect on demineralization and remineralization. (c) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据