4.7 Article

Are childhood socio-economic circumstances related to coronary heart disease risk? Findings from a population-based study of older men

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
卷 36, 期 3, 页码 560-566

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/ije/dym060

关键词

childhood social circumstances; adult social class; behavioural. risk factors; CHD; old age

资金

  1. Medical Research Council [G0501859, G0501859(76641)] Funding Source: Medline
  2. Medical Research Council [G0501859] Funding Source: researchfish
  3. MRC [G0501859] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background The independent influence of childhood social circumstances on health in later life remains uncertain. We examined the extent to which childhood socioeconomic circumstances are related to the risk of coronary heart disease (CHD) in older British men, taking account of adult social class and behavioural risk factors. Methods A socio-economically representative sample of 5552 British men (52-74 years) with retrospective assessment of childhood socio-economic circumstances (father's occupation and childhood household amenities) who were followed up for CHD (fatal and non-fatal) for 12 years. Results Men whose childhood social class was manual had an increased hazard ratio (HR) 1.34 (95% CI 1.11-1.63)-this effect was diminished when adjusted for adult social class and adult behavioural risk factors (cigarette smoking, alcohol, physical activity and body weight) (HR 1.19; 95% CI 0.97-1.46). Men whose family did not own a car in their childhood were at increased CHD risk even after adjustments for adult social class and behaviours (HR 1.35, 95% CI 1.04-1.75). Men with combined exposure to both childhood and adult manual social class had the highest risk of CHD (HR 1.51; 95% CI 1.19-1.91); this was substantially reduced by adjustment for adult behavioural risk factors (adjusted HR 1.28; 95% CI 0.99-1.65). Conclusions Less affluent socio-economic conditions in childhood may have a modest persisting influence on risk of CHD in later life.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据