4.6 Article

Chromatographic analysis of major non-structural carbohydrates in several wood species - an analytical approach for higher accuracy of data

期刊

ANALYTICAL METHODS
卷 2, 期 5, 页码 532-538

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/b9ay00193j

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The exact and reliable determination of non-structural carbohydrates (NSC) in wood samples of different origin allows to gain further insight into the biogeochemical carbon cycle, Le. processes that determine how carbon - and carbon dioxide - migrate between the land, the sea and the atmosphere. Plants are an essential part of this cycle using carbon dioxide in photosynthesis and locking up carbon within proteins and carbohydrates. Analytical determination of NSC is complicated by the complexity of the carbohydrate mixtures. However, most of them are present at the trace level only, and do not substantially contribute to the global NSC. Most important are glucose, sucrose, fructose and starch. Traditionally, these carbohydrates are analyzed spectrophotometrically. The spectrophotometric method does not provide any information on concentrations of sugar alcohols and raffinose. They can make up to a quarter of total NSC in deciduous tree samples. Consequently, ignoring them will severely impair the accuracy of NSC data in these samples. We will therefore present a method that allows the reliable determination of the following sugar alcohols and carbohydrates: inositol, sorbitol, mannitol, glucose, fructose, sucrose, raffinose and starch. These were the major contributors to the pool of nonstructural carbohydrates in the samples we examined. It is important to note, that the portion of sugar alcohols and raffinose in the samples ranged from <2-25% of total NSC, irrespective of the plant species, with strongest impact (>= 15% of NSC) for the conifer species Pine and the deciduous species Ash Tree and Wild Cherry. Application of our method substantially improved the accuracy of NSC data in these samples if compared to those of the spectrophotometrical analysis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据