4.7 Article

Sex differences in the renal changes elicited by angiotensin II blockade during the nephrogenic period

期刊

HYPERTENSION
卷 49, 期 6, 页码 1429-1435

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.107.087957

关键词

nephrogenesis; sex; angiotensin II; glomerulosclerosis; fibrosis; renal hemodynamics

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The renin-angiotensin system plays an important role in renal development. However, it is unknown whether reduction in angiotensin II effects during the nephrogenic period leads to different renal alterations in males and females during the adult age. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the role of angiotensin II on renal development is sex dependent and whether there are sex differences in blood pressure, renal hemodynamics, and severity of renal damage during adult life when nephrogenesis is altered by blocking angiotensin II effects. Newborn Sprague-Dawley rats were treated with an angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonist ( L-158.809; 7 mg/kg per day) during the first 2 weeks of life. At 3 months of age, changes in blood pressure, albuminuria, and renal hemodynamics were assessed, and stereological and histopathologic studies were performed. Blood pressure increased ( 127 +/- 0.5 versus 115 +/- 0.7 mm Hg in control rats; P < 0.05) and nephron number decreased ( 37%; P < 0.05) similarly in treated males and females. However, only males had an elevation in albuminuria ( 5.92 +/- 1.65 versus 0.33 +/- 0.09 mg per day in control rats; P < 0.05), a fall in glomerular filtration rate ( 12.6%; P < 0.05), and a significant decrease in papillary volume ( 42%; P < 0.05). Mean glomerular volume, glomerulosclerosis, arteriolar hypertrophy, and tubulointerstitial damage in cortex and medulla were also higher ( P < 0.05) in angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonist-treated males than in treated females. The results of this study suggest that females seem to be more protected than males to the renal consequences of reducing angiotensin II effects during renal development.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据