4.7 Article

Tenascin-C synthesized in both donor grafts and recipients accelerates artery graft stenosis

期刊

CARDIOVASCULAR RESEARCH
卷 74, 期 3, 页码 366-376

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.cardiores.2007.02.028

关键词

cardiovascular surgery; coronary disease; remodeling; transgenic animal models; extracellular matrix

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: Tenascin-C, an extracellular matrix glycoprotein, is thought to play an important role in neointimal hyperplasia of artery bypass grafts. In this study, the direct contribution of tenascin-C to neointimal hyperplasia of free artery grafts and the origin of tenascin-C-producing cells were examined using tenascin-C transgenic mice. Methods and results: Abdominal aorta-to-carotid artery interposition grafting was performed in mice. When grafts from wild-type mice were transplanted to wild-type, neointimal hyperplasia was observed in the grafts at days 14 and 28. Immumohistochemical staining showed strong expression of tenascin-C in the media and neointima of the grafts. Much less neointimal hyperplasia was seen when grafts from tenascin-C-deficient mice were transplanted to tenascin-C-deficient mice. In tenascin-C-deficient grafts transplanted to wild-type mice, tenascin-C deposition was observed only in the neointima. In the reverse combination, deposition was seen in the media and neointima. The source of the tenascin-C-producing cells was analyzed using heterozygous mice that identically express both tenascin-C and LacZ. While LacZ-positive cells were seen only in the neointima of artery grafts from wild-type transplanted to mutant mice, positive cells were detected in both the neointima and media in grafts from mutant to wild-type mice. Conclusions: We presented direct evidence that tenascin-C is a crucial molecule in neointimal hyperplasia in free artery grafts, and that tenascin-C-producing cells are derived from both donor grafts and recipients. (C) 2007 European Society of Cardiology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据