4.5 Article

Hypoxic stimulus alters hypothalamic AMP-activated protein kinase phosphorylation concomitant to hypophagia

期刊

JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY
卷 102, 期 6, 页码 2135-2141

出版社

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.01150.2006

关键词

leptin; neuropeptide Y; insulin; altitude; acetyl-coenzyme A carboxylase

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Acute exposure to hypobaric hypoxia is known to decrease food intake, but the molecular mechanisms of such alteration in feeding behavior remain unknown. We tested the hypothesis that hypothalamic AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) phosphorylation is affected by acute exposure to hypobaric hypoxia and thus would be involved in initial anorexia. To address this issue, male rats weighing 255-270 g were either submitted to hypobaric hypoxia (H. equivalent altitude of 5,500 m), maintained under local barometric pressure conditions (N), or pair-fed an equivalent quantity of food to that consumed by H rats (PF), for 6, 24, or 48 h. Daily food intake dropped by 73% during the first day of hypoxia (P < 0.01) and remained by 46% lower than in N rats thereafter (P < 0.01). Hypoxia per se, as estimated by comparing experimental data between the H and PF groups, increased ob gene transcription and plasma leptin concentration. A transient increase in glucose availability occurred in the H group compared with PF animals (P < 0.05). The hypoxic stimulus led to an early and transient decrease in hypothalamic AMPK and acetyl-CoA carboxylase (ACC) phosphorylation. concomitant with hypophagia and associated alterations in nutrients and hormones. An increase in NPY mRNA levels occurred from day 1, similarly in H and PF rats, and thus mainly related to food restriction alone (P < 0.05). In conclusion, the present study demonstrates that hypoxia per se inhibited AMPK and ACC phosphorylation in the hypothalamus, concomitant with profound anorexia. A powerful counter-regulation occurs rapidly, mediated by NPY and devoted to avoid prolonged anorexia.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据