4.7 Article

Partial oxidation of methane with air for synthesis gas production in a multistage gliding arc discharge system

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY
卷 32, 期 8, 页码 1067-1079

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2006.07.013

关键词

partial oxidation of methane; synthesis gas; gliding arc discharge; plasma

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Conventional catalytic processes of CH4 conversion to produce synthesis gas require both high temperatures and high pressure. Non-thermal plasma is considered to be a promising technology for the synthesis gas production from methane since it can operate in ambient conditions. In this study, a multistage gliding arc discharge system was employed to investigate the effects of stage number, feed gas composition, feed flow rate, frequency, applied voltage, and electrode gap distance on the CH4 and O-2 conversions and the product distribution. The studied system consisted of four units of gliding arc discharge reactors connected in series, and the plasma generated across the gliding arc electrodes was AC current with different voltages and frequencies. In this study, air was used for the partial oxidation of methane. The results showed that increasing stage number, voltage, or electrode gap distance enhanced both CH4 and O-2 conversions in contrast with the effects of increasing CH4/O-2 molar ratio, feed flow rate, and frequency. The optimum conditions were found at a CH4/O-2 molar ratio of 3/1, a feed flow rate of 150 cm(3)/min, and a frequency of 300 Hz for the maximum conversions of CH4 and O-2 with a high synthesis gas selectivity and a very low energy consumption. The energy consumption of the gliding arc discharge system was found to be low, about 2.45 x 10(-18)-2.96 x 10(-18) W s (15.3-18.5 eV)/molecule of CH4 converted as compared to 3.36 x 10(-18) W s (21 eV)/molecule of CH4 converted for the corona discharge system with pin and plate electrodes. (C) 2006 International Association for Hydrogen Energy. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据