4.4 Article

Fabrication of an Amperometric Triglyceride Biosensor based on PVC Membrane

期刊

ANALYTICAL LETTERS
卷 43, 期 1, 页码 1-11

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/00032710802586913

关键词

Co-immobilization; GK; GPO; HRP; Lipase; PVC; Serum; TG biosensor; Triglycerides; Triolein

资金

  1. Department of Biotechnology, Government of India, New Delhi

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An amperometric enzyme sensor for determination of triglycerides (TGs) was constructed by mounting polyvinyl chloride (PVC) membrane bound lipase, glycerol kinase (GK), glycerol-3-phosphate oxidase (GPO), and horseradish peroxidase (HRP) on a platinum electrode (working electrode), then connecting it to electrometer along with Ag/AgCl reference electrode and Cu auxiliary electrode. The biosensor measures the electrons generated from H2O2 at 0.4V, which is formed from triolein/triglycerides by co-immobilized lipase, GK, GPO, and HRP. The concentration of triolein/TG was directly proportional to the current measured. The enzyme electrode showed optimum response when operated at 25 degrees C in 0.1M sodium phosphate buffer, pH 7.5, for 30s. A linear relationship was obtained between triolein concentration ranging from 0.56 to 2.25mM and amount of current (mA). The minimum detection limit of the method was 0.11mM. The levels of TG in serum of apparently healthy persons and persons suffering from cardiovascular disease and pancreatitis, as measured by this sensor, were in the range 50-216mg/dl and 200-499mg/dl respectively. The analytical recovery of added triolein was 85.2%. Within-batch and between-batch coefficients of variation were2.53% and 3.21% respectively. A good correlation (r=0.91) was found between serum TG values obtained by commercial enzymic colorimetric and the present method. Among the various serum substances tested, only cholesterol and bilirubin caused inhibition, 15% and 8% respectively. The enzyme electrode was used 100 times over 40 days without any considerable loss of activity when stored at 4 degrees C.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据