4.7 Article

Transformation of temporal properties between auditory midbrain and cortex in the awake Mongolian gerbil

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE
卷 27, 期 23, 页码 6091-6102

出版社

SOC NEUROSCIENCE
DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4848-06.2007

关键词

inferior colliculus; auditory cortex; anesthetic effects; adaptation; amplitude modulation; binary coding

资金

  1. NIDCD NIH HHS [DC006864, R01 DC006864] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The neural representation of meaningful stimulus features is thought to rely on precise discharge characteristics of the auditory cortex. Precisely timed onset spikes putatively carry the majority of stimulus-related information in auditory cortical neurons but make a small contribution to stimulus representation in the auditory midbrain. Because these conclusions derive primarily from anesthetized preparations, we reexamined temporal coding properties of single neurons in the awake gerbil inferior colliculus (IC) and compared them with primary auditory cortex (AI). Surprisingly, AI neurons displayed a reduction of temporal precision compared with those in the IC. Furthermore, this hierarchical transition from high to low temporal fidelity was observed for both static and dynamic stimuli. Because most of the data that support temporal precision were obtained under anesthesia, we also reexamined response properties of IC and AI neurons under these conditions. Our results show that anesthesia has profound effects on the trial-to-trial variability and reliability of discharge and significantly improves the temporal precision of AI neurons to both tones and amplitude-modulated stimuli. In contrast, IC temporal properties are only mildly affected by anesthesia. These results underscore the pitfalls of using anesthetized preparations to study temporal coding. Our findings in awake animals reveal that AI neurons combine faster adaptation kinetics and a longer temporal window than evident in IC to represent ongoing acoustic stimuli.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据