4.8 Article

Immuno-Electrochemiluminescent Imaging of a Single Cell Based on Functional Nanoprobes of Heterogeneous Ru(bpy)32+@SiO2/Au Nanoparticles

期刊

ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 90, 期 17, 页码 10334-10339

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.8b02141

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21675136]
  2. Plan for Scientific Innovation Talent of Henan Province [2017JR0016]
  3. Science & Technology Innovation Talents in Universities of Henan Province [18HASTIT003]
  4. Funding Scheme for the Young Backbone Teachers of Higher Education Institutions in Henan Province [2016GGJS-097]
  5. Nanhu Young Scholar Supporting Program of XYNU

向作者/读者索取更多资源

It is valuable to develop a sensing platform for not only detecting a tumor marker in body fluids but also measuring its expression at single cells. In the present study, a simple closed bipolar electrodes-based electrochemiluminescence (BPEs-ECL) imaging strategy was developed for visual immunoassay of prostate specific antigen (PSA) at single cells using functional nanoprobes of heterogeneous Ru(bpy)(3)(2+)@SiO2/Au nanoparticles. Multiple-assisted ECL signal amplification strategy was introduced into the detection system on the basis of the synergetic amplifying effect of the anodic and cathodic amplification. On the basis of the synergetic amplifying effect, the detection limits of PSA by using photomultiplier tube and charge-coupled device (CCD) imaging are 3.0 and 31 pg/mL, respectively. The obtained immunosensor was employed to evaluate PSA levels in serum samples with a satisfying result. Moreover, the obtained functional nanoprobes were used to visually profile the PSA expression on the surface of single LNCaP cells (a kind of prostate cancer cells) based on a bare BPE. The results show that the functional nanoprobesbased ECL imaging immunoassay provides a promising visual platform for detecting tumor markers (proteins and cancer cells) and thus shows a high potential in cancer diagnosis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据