4.7 Article

Species-Dependent Splice Recognition of a Cryptic Exon Resulting from a Recurrent Intronic CEP290 Mutation that Causes Congenital Blindness

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR SCIENCES
卷 16, 期 3, 页码 5285-5298

出版社

MDPI AG
DOI: 10.3390/ijms16035285

关键词

-

资金

  1. Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO) [VENI 916.10.096]
  2. Foundation Fighting Blindness (FFB) USA [TA-GT-0912-0582-RAD]
  3. JANIVO stichting
  4. Stichting August F. Deutman Researchfonds Oogheelkunde
  5. Rotterdamse Vereniging Blindenbelangen
  6. Algemene Nederlandse Vereniging ter Voorkoming van Blindheid
  7. Gelderse Blindenstichting
  8. Stichting Winckel-Sweep
  9. Stichting Nederlands Oogheelkundig Onderzoek

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A mutation in intron 26 of CEP290 (c.2991+1655A>G) is the most common genetic cause of Leber congenital amaurosis (LCA), a severe type of inherited retinal degeneration. This mutation creates a cryptic splice donor site, resulting in the insertion of an aberrant exon (exon X) into ~50% of all CEP290 transcripts. A humanized mouse model with this mutation did not recapitulate the aberrant CEP290 splicing observed in LCA patients, suggesting differential recognition of cryptic splice sites between species. To further assess this phenomenon, we generated two CEP290 minigene constructs, with and without the intronic mutation, and transfected these in cell lines of various species. RT-PCR analysis revealed that exon X is well recognized by the splicing machinery in human and non-human primate cell lines. Intriguingly, this recognition decreases in cell lines derived from species such as dog and rodents, and it is completely absent in Drosophila. In addition, other cryptic splicing events corresponding to sequences in intron 26 of CEP290 were observed to varying degrees in the different cell lines. Together, these results highlight the complexity of splice site recognition among different species, and show that care is warranted when generating animal models to mimic splice site mutations in vivo.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据