4.7 Article

Reversible-equivalent-monomolecular tau: A leaping method for small number and stiff stochastic chemical systems

期刊

JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL PHYSICS
卷 224, 期 2, 页码 897-923

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2006.10.034

关键词

tau-leaping; stochastic chemical kinetics; chemical master equation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Leaping methods provide for efficient and approximate time stepping of chemical reaction systems modeled by continuous time discrete state stochastic dynamics. We investigate the application of leaping methods for small number and stiff systems, i.e. systems whose dynamics involve different time scales and have some molecular species present in very small numbers, specifically in the range 0 to 10. We propose a new explicit leaping scheme, reversible-equivalent-monomolecular tau (REMM-tau), which shows considerable promise in the simulation of such systems. The REMM-tau scheme is based on the fact that the exact solution of the two prototypical monomolecular reversible reactions S-1 <-> S-2 and S <-> 0 as a function of time takes a simple form involving binomial and/or Poisson random variables. The REMM-tau method involves approximating bimolecular reversible reactions by suitable monomolecular reversible reactions as well as considering each reversible pair of reactions in the system to be operating in isolation during the time step tau. We illustrate the use of the REMM-tau method through a number of biologically motivated examples and compare its performance to those of the implicit-tau and trapezoidal implicit-tau algorithms. In most cases considered, REMM-tau appears to perform better than these two methods while having the important advantage of being computationally faster due to the explicit nature of the method. Furthermore when stepsize T is increased the REMM-tau exhibits a more robust performance than the implicit-tau or the trapezoidal implicit-tau for small number stiff problems. (c) 2006 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据